AIM logo
Alcohol in
Moderation
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Aim Digest
  • About AIM
  • AIM Council
Subscribe
Log in
  • All articles
  • All critiques
  • All-cause mortality& alcohol
  • Cancer& alcohol
    • Breast cancer
    • Colorectal cancers
    • Head and neck cancers
    • Lung cancer
    • Prostate cancer
  • Diabetes& alcohol
  • Heart& alcohol
    • Arrhythmia
    • Cardiovascular disease
    • Coronary heart disease
    • Cholesterol
    • Heart attack
    • Heart failure
    • Hypertension
  • Antioxidants& alcohol
  • Bone mineral density& alcohol
  • The brain& alcohol
    • Cognitive decline
  • General health& alcohol
  • J-shaped curve& alcohol
  • The kidneys& alcohol
  • The liver& alcohol
  • Mediterranean diet& alcohol
  • Moderate drinking
  • Old age& alcohol
    • Cognitive decline
  • Parkinsons' disease& alcohol
  • Arthritis& alcohol
  • Stroke
  • Women& alcohol
    • Breast cancer
    • Pregnancy
Choose a Topic
December 2022
All-cause mortality
,
J-shaped curve

Are U-shaped relationships between risk factors and outcomes artifactual?

A study evaluated whether the observed nadir in a U- or J-shaped relationship between a particular risk factor and a future health outcome is a function of the distribution of the risk factor in the sample being analyzed.
Data from the ORIGIN trial were used to assess the relationship between three risk factors (weight, systolic blood pressure, and serum insulin) and the hazard of a major cardiovascular event comprising a nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Three spline curves were generated for each risk factor. The first was based on all available data, the second for a subgroup with a higher mean risk factor level, and the third for a subgroup with a lower mean risk factor level. Nadir levels of the risk factor (i.e., risk factor levels predicting the lowest hazard) were then identified for each spline curve.
When compared to the nadir values based on all available data, nadir values for all three risk factors were higher for the subgroups with higher mean levels and lower for those with lower mean levels.
The researchers conclude that the distribution of a risk factor in the population is an important determinant of its nadir value. Populations with high or low values may have high and low nadirs, respectively. Identification of a nadir for a modifiable risk factor from epidemiologic relationships may therefore arise from this distribution bias and is therefore unrelated to therapeutic targets.
Source: Shah, R, Thabane, L, Gerstein, HC. Are U-shaped relationships between risk factors and outcomes artifactual? Journal of Diabetes. 2022; 1- 7.
doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13335
Drinking & You logo
Drinking & You
A global portal providing advice about responsible alcohol consumption, individual country government guidelines and your health.
Go to website
International Scientific Forum on Alcohol Research logo
International Scientific Forum on Alcohol Research
The International Scientific Forum on Alcohol Research (ISFAR) is a group of 45 specialist Professors and Medics who produce balanced and well researched analysis of emerging research papers alcohol and health.
Go to website

To receive notification of updates to the website, please subscribe here

Name(Required)

Topics

Harmful consumption

& alcohol

Healthy lifestyle

& alcohol

Genetics

& alcohol

Depression

& alcohol

Mental health

& alcohol

All-cause mortality

& alcohol

Cancer

& alcohol

Diabetes

& alcohol

Heart

& alcohol

Antioxidants

& alcohol

Bone mineral density

& alcohol

The brain

& alcohol

General health

& alcohol

Gut health

& alcohol

J-shaped curve

& alcohol

The kidneys

& alcohol

The liver

& alcohol

Mediterranean diet

& alcohol

Metabolic syndrome/weight

& alcohol

Moderate drinking

Old age

& alcohol

Parkinsons' disease

& alcohol

Arthritis

& alcohol

Stroke

& alcohol

Women

& alcohol

Latest articles

Reevaluating the alcohol–cancer link: Long-term cancer mortality outcomes in the REGARDS Study

Zero tolerance for 0%? How should clinicians and other practitioners respond to the use of alcohol-free and low-alcohol products in higher risk groups

Alcohol consumption and molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer: pooled observational and Mendelian randomization analyses

Alcohol consumption and the incidence of hyperuricemia in Japanese men and women

Alcohol-attributable cancer risk and burden estimates for Australia’s updated alcohol consumption guidelines

Aim Digest

September 2026

June 2026

May 2026

April 2026

February 2026

© Alcohol In Moderation, 2026.
Web design by Rubber Duckers
Close menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Aim Digest
  • About AIM
  • AIM Council
Subscribe
Log in
Close menu
  • All articles
  • All critiques
  • All-cause mortality& alcohol
  • Cancer& alcohol
    • ← Back
    • Breast cancer
    • Colorectal cancers
    • Head and neck cancers
    • Lung cancer
    • Prostate cancer
  • Diabetes& alcohol
  • Heart& alcohol
    • ← Back
    • Arrhythmia
    • Cardiovascular disease
    • Coronary heart disease
    • Cholesterol
    • Heart attack
    • Heart failure
    • Hypertension
  • Antioxidants& alcohol
  • Bone mineral density& alcohol
  • The brain& alcohol
    • ← Back
    • Cognitive decline
  • General health& alcohol
  • J-shaped curve& alcohol
  • The kidneys& alcohol
  • The liver& alcohol
  • Mediterranean diet& alcohol
  • Moderate drinking
  • Old age& alcohol
    • ← Back
    • Cognitive decline
  • Parkinsons' disease& alcohol
  • Arthritis& alcohol
  • Stroke
  • Women& alcohol
    • ← Back
    • Breast cancer
    • Pregnancy