Moderation
Alcohol and Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
A substantial body of research has examined the relationship between alcohol consumption and risk of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Researchers aimed to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies examining the relationship between alcohol consumption and risk of Parkinson’s disease.Eligible studies comparing Parkinson’s disease risk in ever vs. never alcohol drinkers were sourced from 6 databases. Outcomes were pooled using standard meta-analysis techniques. Separate female and male estimates were generated from studies reporting sex-specific data. Additionally, cohort studies stratifying participants by quantity of alcohol intake were integrated in a dose-response analysis.
52 studies were included, totalling 63,707 Parkinson’s disease patients and 9,817,924 controls. The meta-analysis supported a statistically significant overrepresentation of never drinkers among Parkinson’s disease subjects; odds ratio (OR) for ever drinking alcohol 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 – 0.92). A subgroup analysis revealed similar effect estimates in females and males. A further synthesis of seven cohort studies suggested a negative, dose-dependent association between alcohol and risk of Parkinson’s disease.
The authors state that in the absence of a known neuroprotective pathway, there may be reason to doubt a true biological effect. The role of survivor bias, selection and recall bias, misclassification, and residual confounding requires consideration. Alternatively, observations might be attributable to reverse causation if those predestined for Parkinson’s disease alter their alcohol habits during the preclinical phase. Major limitations of the study include high between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 93.2%) and lack of adjustment for key confounders, namely smoking status.
Source: Mitchell E, Chohan H, Bestwick JP, Noyce AJ. Alcohol and Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Parkinsons Dis. 2022;12(8):2369-2381.